Industries overview
Industries
Financial Services Consumer & Retail Manufacturing & Industrial Hospitality & Media Energy & Infrastructure Aviation & Transport Telecommunications Technology & Innovation Government & Public Sector Development & NGOs Agribusiness Healthcare Services overview
Strategy & analytics
Marketing & Strategic Consulting Business Analysis Data Analytics & Insights
Projects & capability
Business Plans & Feasibility Studies Project Management & Monitoring Training & Capacity Development
Finance & accounting
Finance Advisory Financial Reporting Technical Accounting
Tax, risk & governance
Tax Advisory Organisational & Risk Advisory Approach Insights About Discuss your challenge

Strategy, finance, tax and risk advisory

Clarity for the decisions your business can’t afford to get wrong.

Helping business leaders turn market complexity into clear, actionable decisions — from strategy, analysis and project funding to financial reporting, technical accounting, tax and risk.

Business challenges that might sound familiar.

Each of these points to one or more of our advisory areas — often more than one at once.

  • Considering a new market or customer segment, but unsure where the real opportunity lies.Marketing & strategic consulting
  • Processes that depend on individual memory rather than clear documentation.Business analysis
  • Reports that describe what happened but don’t help decide what to do next.Data analytics & insights
  • Seeking funding without a business plan or feasibility study that a lender will take seriously.Business plans & feasibility studies
  • Year-end reporting that takes longer every period and leans on manual spreadsheets.Financial reporting
  • Unclear ownership of a decision, a risk, or a control as the organisation has grown.Organisational & risk advisory
  • A funded project drifting from its plan, with progress reports that arrive late.Project management & monitoring
  • Budgets and forecasts that don’t steer the business, or cash that is tighter than expected.Finance advisory
  • Planning an acquisition, financing or reorganisation without a clear view of its tax consequences.Tax advisory
  • A new or unusual transaction with no agreed accounting treatment.Technical accounting

How an engagement typically unfolds.

A practical sequence — adapted to the scope and timeline of each piece of work.

01

Understand

Clarify the business question before any analysis starts.

02

Assess

Review the available evidence — data, documents, people.

03

Develop options

Set out realistic choices, with trade-offs made explicit.

04

Agree priorities

Settle on a plan the organisation can realistically resource.

05

Support delivery

Stay involved through implementation, where scope allows.

See our full approach

“Advisory areas. One way of working: understand, then evidence, then decide.”

African Consulting Professionals Ltd works across connected areas, from strategy and analysis to business plans, project management, finance, tax and risk.

Each can stand alone. Together, they cover the arc of a business decision — from understanding a market, to analysing how the business operates, to building the plan and the funding case behind it, to making sure it can be delivered, governed, reported accurately and understood in tax terms before it is committed to.

Learn more about us

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

About Us

African Consulting Professionals Ltd is an advisory firm working across connected areas: strategic and marketing consulting, business analysis, data analytics and insights, business plans and feasibility studies, project management and monitoring, training, finance advisory, financial reporting, technical accounting, tax advisory, and organisational and risk advisory — for clients across Africa and around the world.

A management and research consulting firm.

Practical advice for organisations across sectors, from strategy and performance to funding, projects and finance.

African Consulting Professionals Ltd is a management and research consulting firm. We offer a wide range of services that meet the management needs of enterprises in different industries, and we aim to add value in every engagement.

Clients typically come to us for business and internal improvement plans, and for strategies to generate and grow revenue.

Alongside this advisory work, the firm also provides services in general management, corporate strategy, organisational studies, and training and manpower development.

Organisations we advise
  • Government and public sector organisations.
  • Banks and other financial institutions.
  • Manufacturing and service organisations.
  • Aviation, transport, energy and infrastructure businesses.
  • Development-funded and donor-supported programmes.

How the areas work together.

A strategy recommendation is only as strong as the evidence behind it — and only useful if it can be delivered safely.

A strategic recommendation is only as good as the analysis behind it. Deciding to enter a new market or reposition against competitors means little without a grounded view of customer behaviour, competitive dynamics and the organisation’s actual capacity to execute.

That grounded view comes from business analysis — understanding how the organisation currently operates — and from data analytics, which turns scattered information into indicators leadership can actually use.

And every plan needs governance and risk discipline to be delivered without creating new problems along the way — which is where organisational and risk advisory comes in: clarifying ownership, strengthening controls, and building a realistic change plan.

Finally, financial reporting and technical accounting make sure the numbers and the accounting treatment behind a plan stand up to review, and tax advisory makes sure its consequences — on income, on VAT and other indirect taxes, and on any transaction or restructuring involved — are understood before decisions are committed, rather than discovered afterwards.

The areas can be engaged independently, based on the specific question a client is facing, or combined where a decision genuinely spans more than one.

Rooted in Africa, built for the world.

The advisory approach is built to work across diverse markets — from fast-moving African economies to global business environments — not applied from a single abstract template.

African Consulting Professionals Ltd combines a grounded understanding of African market dynamics with an approach built to serve clients wherever they operate. Businesses increasingly work across borders, and good advisory work has to account for both local realities — infrastructure, regulation, the pace at which decisions actually get made — and the wider international context a client is operating in.

The firm’s work is supported by local alliances and an extensive local network, which helps bring practical, on-the-ground knowledge to each engagement.

Americas Europe Middle East Asia
Local knowledge, international reach

How we work.

The commitments we hold ourselves to on every engagement.

  • Integrity and transparency. We report what the evidence shows and are open about how we reached our conclusions, because advice is only useful if it can be trusted.
  • Independence. We keep our independence on every assignment, and would tell you at the outset if we saw any real, perceived or apparent conflict of interest.
  • Confidentiality. It is our policy to keep confidential all the information we obtain for each assignment.
  • Commitment to timeframe. We agree a timeframe up front and staff the engagement to meet it, with a team that combines the right mix of experience and technical knowledge.
  • The right people. Our consultants are carefully selected and trained to be dedicated, technically sound, independent-minded and conscientious — and to treat clients and their teams with courtesy.
Our mission

To help business leaders make clearer, better-evidenced decisions — in Africa and around the world.

Our vision

To be a trusted advisory partner for organisations navigating growth and change, wherever they operate.

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

What we do

Advisory areas, one way of working.

Each area addresses a different kind of business question. They can be engaged separately, or combined, depending on what you’re deciding.

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Marketing & Strategic Consulting

For leadership teams weighing where to compete and how — entering a new market, targeting a different customer segment, repositioning against competitors, or setting priorities for growth. The aim is a clear, evidence-based view of the opportunity and a workable plan for pursuing it.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • Considering entry into a new geography, channel or customer segment without a clear read on opportunity size or existing competition.
  • Growth has stalled, and it isn’t clear whether the cause is the market, the offer, or how it’s positioned.
  • Multiple strategic priorities competing for limited budget and management attention.
  • A pricing approach that hasn’t been reviewed against what competitors and customers actually do.
  • Plans that sound right in the boardroom but haven’t been tested against how customers actually decide.
  • No clear view of how products or services compare with competitors’, or of how satisfied customers really are.
How we could approach it
  • Market and customer research to understand demand, buying behaviour and unmet needs.
  • Quantitative surveys and focus groups, including customer-satisfaction studies, to test assumptions against real customers.
  • Segmentation to identify which customer groups are worth prioritising.
  • Competitive analysis to map how rivals compete and where gaps exist.
  • Benchmarking products, services and performance against competitors, and designing improvement strategies.
  • Positioning work to define a clear, differentiated place in the market.
  • Corporate and strategic planning: short-, medium- and long-term plans with financial projections and action plans.
  • Go-to-market planning sequenced against resources and capability.
  • Defining the measures that will show whether the strategy is working.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A market assessment summarising opportunity size, competitive dynamics and risks.
  • A positioning brief defining who the offer is for, and why it wins.
  • A prioritised strategic roadmap sequencing initiatives against resources.
  • A corporate plan with financial projections and an action plan.
  • A benchmarking or customer-satisfaction report with recommendations.
  • A measurement plan defining the indicators leadership should track.
Intended benefits

Done well, this work should leave leadership with a clearer view of where to focus, a positioning customers recognise, and a roadmap that reflects real capacity — not a plan that looks good on paper and stalls at implementation. As with any strategy work, outcomes depend on execution and on market conditions outside any advisor’s control.

Frequently asked questions
Do you produce advertising or marketing campaigns?
No. This work is strategic — research, positioning and planning — not creative production or campaign execution. If you need campaign delivery, we can discuss how this work would hand off to a creative or media partner.
How long does a strategy engagement typically take?
It depends on the scope and the amount of existing research available. We’ll propose a timeline specific to your question once we understand it, rather than quoting a standard duration.
Do we need existing market data before starting?
No. Part of the early work is establishing what’s already known, what’s assumed, and what needs to be researched.
Can this be limited to a positioning review, rather than a full strategy engagement?
Yes. Scope can be sized to a specific question rather than a full strategic review.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Business Analysis

For teams trying to understand how the business actually operates today, where it breaks down, and what a better process or operating model would look like. This work sits between strategy and execution — turning a business problem into a plan that can be implemented.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • A process that takes longer, costs more, or produces more errors than it should, with no clear picture of why.
  • Requirements for a new system or process that different stakeholders describe differently.
  • A planned investment in new capability that hasn’t yet been tested with a business case.
  • Handoffs between teams or departments that regularly cause delay or rework.
  • Plans to grow or restructure that need a clear view of the current operating model first.
How we could approach it
  • Stakeholder interviews to capture requirements and differing points of view.
  • Current-state process mapping to document how work actually flows today.
  • Bottleneck and root-cause identification.
  • Options assessment, comparing realistic ways to address the problem.
  • Business case development to support an investment decision.
  • Future-state recommendations and an implementation-ready backlog.
Illustrative deliverables
  • Process maps of current and proposed future-state workflows.
  • Requirements documentation capturing stakeholder needs.
  • A business case setting out cost, benefit and risk for the recommended option.
  • An implementation backlog sequencing the work required.
Intended benefits

This work is intended to replace assumption with a documented, shared understanding of how the business runs — so decisions about change are based on evidence rather than the loudest opinion in the room. As with any change process, realising the benefit depends on the organisation’s capacity to implement what’s recommended.

Frequently asked questions
Do you implement the changes you recommend, or just advise on them?
Scope depends on the engagement — some clients want recommendations and a backlog; others want support through implementation. We’ll agree the boundary upfront.
Is this only useful for large organisations?
No — the same discipline of mapping and diagnosing a process applies at any size; the scope is simply smaller.
Do you use a specific business analysis methodology or notation?
We adapt documentation methods, such as standard process-mapping notation, to what’s useful for the client and the problem, rather than imposing one fixed framework.
What do you need from us to get started?
Access to the people who do the work day-to-day, and to whatever documentation already exists — even if it’s outdated or incomplete.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Data Analytics & Insights

For teams that have data but not yet the indicators, reporting or confidence to use it in decisions. This work focuses on getting from raw data to something leadership can actually act on.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • Reports that show a lot of numbers but don’t answer the question leadership is actually asking.
  • Data spread across systems and spreadsheets that don’t reconcile with each other.
  • No agreed definition of the KPIs that matter, so different teams report different numbers for the same thing.
  • A dashboard or reporting tool that isn’t trusted, so decisions still get made on instinct.
  • Interest in forecasting or segmentation, without a clear sense of what data is available to support it.
How we could approach it
  • A data-quality and readiness assessment: what data exists, where it lives, and how reliable it is.
  • Defining a clear, shared set of KPIs tied to actual decisions.
  • Specifying reporting requirements and dashboard concepts.
  • Building forecasting or segmentation models suited to the data available.
  • Translating analysis into a written insights report leadership can use directly.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A data-quality assessment identifying gaps and reliability issues.
  • A KPI dictionary defining each indicator, its calculation and its owner.
  • A dashboard specification for reporting tools to build against.
  • An insights report translating analysis into recommended decisions.
Intended benefits

The aim is decisions grounded in numbers people trust, rather than numbers that get produced but not used. We don’t claim expertise in a specific analytics platform, AI tool or engineering stack unless it’s agreed for a particular engagement — the starting point is the business question, not the software.

Frequently asked questions
What software or tools do you use?
We work with what the client already has where possible, and we’ll be upfront about which tools we’re comfortable with for a given engagement rather than assuming.
Do you build the dashboards yourselves, or just the specification?
It depends on the engagement and the client’s internal capability — we can specify a dashboard for an internal team to build, or discuss direct build support.
Is this only useful if we already have clean data?
No — assessing and improving data quality is often the first stage of the work, not a prerequisite for starting.
What’s the difference between this and business analysis?
Business analysis focuses on how a process or operating model works; data analytics focuses on what the numbers show. The two often inform each other.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Organisational & Risk Advisory

For leadership teams that need clearer ownership, stronger controls, or a structured way to manage risk as the organisation grows or changes. This is not a substitute for regulated audit, legal advice or formal certification.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • Unclear ownership of key decisions, risks or controls as the organisation has grown.
  • Governance processes that exist on paper but aren’t consistently followed.
  • Concern about operational risk in a specific area of the business, without a structured way to assess it.
  • Planning a significant organisational or process change and needing a change plan, not just a decision.
  • Internal controls that haven’t been reviewed since the business was a different size.
  • Procedures that are not documented, so how work gets done depends on who is doing it.
  • An organisation structure and staffing that no longer match the size or direction of the business.
How we could approach it
  • Mapping organisational responsibilities and decision rights.
  • Reviewing governance processes against how the organisation actually operates.
  • Identifying and assessing operational risks in a defined area of the business.
  • Reviewing internal controls and recommending improvements.
  • Building a practical change roadmap for organisational or process change.
  • Reviewing organisation structure, staffing and manpower needs, including rightsizing and competency gaps.
  • Documenting how work is done: operations manuals, quality manuals aligned to ISO 9000 principles, job descriptions and personnel policies.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A responsibility matrix clarifying ownership of key decisions and controls.
  • A risk register identifying and prioritising operational risks.
  • A control-improvement plan.
  • A change roadmap sequencing organisational or process change.
  • An operations or quality manual for a function or department.
  • An organisation structure review, with job descriptions and personnel policies.
Intended benefits

This work aims to reduce ambiguity about who owns what, and to give leadership a structured view of operational risk. It does not constitute regulated audit, legal advice, or a guarantee of compliance with any specific regulatory regime — for those, a licensed audit or legal professional should be engaged.

Frequently asked questions
Is this the same as an external audit?
No. This is advisory work on governance, risk and controls — not a regulated statutory or external audit.
Can you certify our compliance with a specific regulation?
No. We don’t offer certification. Where regulatory compliance is a concern, we’d recommend involving the relevant licensed professional alongside this work.
Do you focus on financial risk specifically?
The scope covers operational risk and governance broadly; specific financial, legal or regulatory risk areas would be scoped based on the engagement and, where appropriate, alongside specialist advisors.
How is a risk register kept up to date?
We’d typically agree an owner and a review cadence with the client as part of the engagement, so the register doesn’t go stale after delivery.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Tax Advisory

For leadership teams that need to understand the tax consequences of a business decision before it is made, not after. The work covers corporate income tax, PAYE, VAT and other indirect taxes, and the tax side of transactions and restructurings — helping businesses understand their tax obligations and make informed decisions, with practical support on the computations, filings and enquiries that follow, including engagements with the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) and State Internal Revenue Services (SIRS).

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • Launching a new product, service or revenue stream without a clear view of how VAT or other indirect taxes apply.
  • A planned acquisition, disposal, financing or group reorganisation, and no clear picture of its tax consequences.
  • A corporate income tax position that hasn’t been reviewed since the business changed size or shape.
  • Tax computations and filings that depend on one person’s knowledge rather than a documented process.
  • An enquiry from a tax authority, and no plan for how to respond.
How we could approach it
  • Reviewing the corporate income tax position and identifying areas of uncertainty or exposure.
  • Assessing how VAT and other indirect taxes apply to products, services and transactions.
  • Analysing the tax consequences of a proposed transaction or restructuring, and comparing the options.
  • Supporting the preparation of tax computations and filings, and documenting the process behind them.
  • Supporting the response to tax authority queries.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A tax position review summarising areas of uncertainty and recommended actions.
  • A VAT and indirect tax treatment memo for specific products, services or transactions.
  • A transaction or restructuring tax paper comparing the options.
  • Tax computations with supporting workpapers, prepared for filing.
  • A tax compliance calendar with owners and deadlines.
Intended benefits

This work aims to give leadership a clear, documented view of the tax consequences of key decisions, and to make routine tax compliance less dependent on individual memory. Tax rules differ between jurisdictions and change over time, so advice is scoped to the facts and jurisdictions of each engagement. It does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of any tax outcome — and where local rules require a licensed or registered professional to act, we would work alongside one.

Frequently asked questions
Can you help before a decision is made, not just afterwards?
Yes — that is usually when the work is most valuable. Understanding the tax consequences of a transaction, restructuring or new revenue stream at the planning stage leaves more options open than discovering them after the fact.
Do you prepare and file tax returns?
We can support the preparation of tax computations and filings as part of an engagement, scoped to the jurisdiction and agreed at the outset. Where local rules require a registered or licensed professional to sign or submit a filing, we would agree how that is handled before work begins.
Which countries’ tax rules do you cover?
Scope is agreed engagement by engagement, based on the jurisdictions involved. Where a question turns on local rules outside that scope, we would say so and involve an appropriate local advisor rather than guess.
Is this the same as legal advice?
No. This is tax advisory work. Where a question is fundamentally a legal one — for example the drafting of transaction documents — a qualified lawyer should be engaged alongside this work.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Financial Reporting

For finance leaders who need financial statements, disclosures and management reporting that are accurate, timely and ready to withstand review. The work supports the preparation and improvement of IFRS reporting — it is not an audit and does not provide assurance.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • A year-end or interim close that takes longer each period and depends on manual spreadsheets.
  • IFRS financial statements and disclosure notes prepared under time pressure, against a checklist that is incomplete or out of date.
  • Group reporting packs that arrive late or inconsistent, making consolidation slow and error-prone.
  • Management accounts that don’t reconcile cleanly to the statutory financial statements.
  • Preparing for a first IFRS reporting cycle, a listing, or a lender’s reporting requirements.
How we could approach it
  • Reviewing the reporting process from trial balance to published financial statements, and identifying delays and control gaps.
  • Supporting the preparation or review of IFRS financial statements and disclosures against a current disclosure checklist.
  • Designing consolidation and group reporting-pack templates, with clear instructions for each reporting entity.
  • Reconciling management reporting to statutory reporting and documenting the bridges between them.
  • Building a reporting calendar and close plan with owners, dependencies and deadlines.
Illustrative deliverables
  • Draft or reviewed IFRS financial statements with supporting disclosure notes.
  • A disclosure checklist tailored to the entity.
  • A reporting-pack template and consolidation instructions.
  • A close calendar with owners, dependencies and deadlines.
  • A gap assessment of the current reporting process, with prioritised recommendations.
Intended benefits

This work aims to make reporting faster, more consistent and easier to review, and to reduce reliance on individual spreadsheets. It is advisory and preparation support: it is not a statutory audit, review or other assurance engagement, and we do not issue an audit opinion. Responsibility for the financial statements remains with the entity’s management and those charged with governance.

Frequently asked questions
Is this the same as an audit?
No. This is advisory and preparation support. We do not perform statutory audits, reviews or other assurance engagements, and we do not issue audit opinions.
Can you prepare our financial statements?
We can support preparation or review as part of an engagement. Management remains responsible for the financial statements, and we would agree the division of work at the outset.
Can you help us prepare for our auditor?
Yes — by improving documentation, reconciliations and disclosure support so that audit queries can be answered faster. We do not act as your auditor, and we would keep that distinction clear.
Which reporting frameworks do you work with?
The work is centred on IFRS. Where a local reporting requirement sits alongside IFRS, we would agree the scope at the outset and involve a local advisor where needed.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Technical Accounting

For finance teams facing an accounting question the standard doesn’t answer directly — a complex or unusual transaction, a new standard, or a judgement that needs to be documented and defended. The work applies IFRS to the facts and produces a clear, supportable position.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • A new or unusual transaction — a financing structure, a contract with variable terms, a business combination — and no agreed accounting treatment.
  • A new or amended IFRS standard, and no clear view of its impact on the financial statements or on systems.
  • Classification and measurement judgements, for example on financial instruments, that need to be documented and applied consistently.
  • Accounting policies that live in people’s heads or in outdated documents rather than a maintained manual.
  • Auditor questions on judgements that the team struggles to answer with a clear, referenced position.
How we could approach it
  • Establishing the facts of the transaction or arrangement, and the questions the accounting turns on.
  • Analysing the relevant IFRS requirements — for example on financial instruments, revenue, leases, business combinations or insurance contracts — and the alternative interpretations.
  • Writing a position paper that sets out the facts, the analysis, the conclusion and the judgements applied.
  • Assessing the impact of new or amended standards, and planning implementation.
  • Drafting or updating an accounting policy manual, and setting up a simple process to keep it current.
Illustrative deliverables
  • An accounting position paper for a specific transaction or judgement.
  • A new-standard impact assessment.
  • An accounting policy manual, or updates to an existing one.
  • Illustrative journal entries and draft disclosures for the agreed treatment.
  • A judgement log recording key estimates and judgements and their support.
Intended benefits

This work aims to give management clear, documented, referenced accounting positions that it can stand behind and that auditors can review efficiently. Conclusions depend on the facts provided and on the standards in force at the reporting date. It is not an audit opinion, and the entity’s management remains responsible for its accounting policies and financial statements. Where a conclusion is material or likely to be contested, we would recommend discussing it with the auditor early.

Frequently asked questions
Which standards do you cover?
The work is centred on IFRS. Typical areas include financial instruments, revenue, leases, business combinations and insurance contracts; the exact scope is agreed for each engagement.
Will our auditor accept the position paper?
We can’t promise that. We aim to write papers that set out the facts, analysis and judgements clearly so they can be reviewed efficiently, but the auditor forms their own view.
Can you help with a single question without a full engagement?
Often, yes. Scope and timing depend on the complexity of the question and are agreed up front — we don’t quote fixed durations or prices without understanding the work.
Is this the same as tax or legal advice?
No. Where an accounting conclusion interacts with tax or with legal terms, we would flag it and involve our tax advisory team or a qualified lawyer as appropriate.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Finance Advisory

For finance leaders, founders and boards making financial decisions — raising capital, valuing a business, planning the year ahead, or tightening how cash and risk are managed. The work brings structured analysis to the numbers behind a decision, and helps the finance function run on reliable, well-controlled information. It is advisory: it is not an audit, and it is not legal, investment or other regulated advice.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • A fundraising, refinancing or investment decision with no reliable financial model behind it.
  • The need for a defensible view of what a business or asset is worth — for a transaction, a shareholder discussion or a funding round.
  • A transaction where the buyer, seller or lender wants an independent look at the numbers first.
  • Budgets and forecasts built once a year in spreadsheets, and not used to steer the business.
  • Cash tied up in receivables and inventory, unexpected swings in the cash position, or exposure to interest-rate or currency movements that nobody is actively managing.
How we could approach it
  • Financial modelling and valuation: building integrated income statement, balance sheet and cash flow models and applying recognised valuation approaches, with assumptions and sensitivities stated clearly.
  • Fundraising and capital advisory: assessing funding needs and capital structure, comparing debt and equity options, and preparing the financial material funders expect.
  • Financial due diligence: reviewing historical results, cash flow, net debt and working capital on a transaction, and highlighting issues that could affect price or terms.
  • Budgeting and forecasting: designing budgeting and rolling-forecast processes, with variance reporting that management actually uses.
  • Internal controls and governance: reviewing the controls and governance around the finance function and recommending practical improvements.
  • IFRS and financial reporting support: supporting reporting quality where finance questions overlap with IFRS requirements.
  • Working capital and cash management: reviewing the cash cycle, cash forecasting and liquidity planning.
  • Risk management and treasury advisory: identifying liquidity, interest-rate, currency and credit risks, and designing practical policies and reporting to manage them.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A financial model with documented assumptions and scenario analysis.
  • A valuation memo setting out the approach, assumptions and range.
  • A financial due diligence report covering earnings, net debt and working capital.
  • A budget and forecast framework, with a monthly management reporting pack.
  • A cash management and liquidity plan.
  • A treasury or financial risk policy, and a finance controls review with recommendations.
Intended benefits

This work aims to give management, boards and funders numbers they can rely on and decisions they can defend. Models and valuations rest on information and assumptions supplied by management: they are estimates, not predictions or guarantees of an outcome or a price. This is advisory work — it is not an audit or other assurance engagement, a fairness opinion, or legal, tax or regulated investment advice, and we do not guarantee that funding will be raised. Where local rules require a licensed professional to act, we would work alongside one.

Frequently asked questions
Is financial due diligence the same as an audit?
No. Financial due diligence looks at the numbers that matter to a specific transaction decision. It does not provide assurance and we do not issue an audit opinion.
Can you raise capital for us?
We can help assess funding needs, structure the case and prepare the material funders expect. We do not guarantee that funding will be secured, and where regulation requires a licensed intermediary, one would be involved.
Do you provide valuations for financial reporting, tax or regulatory purposes?
Valuations can be prepared to support decisions such as a transaction or funding discussion. Where a valuation is needed for financial reporting, tax or a regulatory filing, we would agree the requirements — and any need for a specialist or licensed valuer — at the outset.
How does this relate to Financial Reporting and Technical Accounting?
Finance advisory looks forward — models, funding, cash and risk. Financial reporting and technical accounting deal with preparing financial statements and applying IFRS. Many engagements use more than one, and we would scope them together.
Can we engage you for a single piece of work, such as a forecasting model?
Yes. Scope can be sized to a specific question, and we would agree it before starting.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Business Plans & Feasibility Studies

For owners and leadership teams preparing to seek funding, launch a project or expand — and for lenders and investors who need to judge whether a proposition stands up. The work tests whether a project is technically feasible, economically viable and commercially profitable, and presents the case in the form funders and approving authorities expect.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • Planning a new venture or an expansion, and needing a business plan that a lender or investor will take seriously.
  • A funding application that has stalled or been declined because the case isn’t clearly evidenced.
  • A long-term concession or build-operate-transfer (BOT) project that needs a feasibility study before approvals and financing can be negotiated.
  • A licence application for a regulated business that must be supported by a feasibility study and a business plan.
  • An existing operation in difficulty, where investors or lenders want an independent view before deciding whether to keep backing it.
How we could approach it
  • Testing technical feasibility, economic viability and commercial profitability, with the assumptions made explicit.
  • Assessing the market and demand behind the revenue case.
  • Building financial projections, with sensitivity analysis to show what the case depends on.
  • Identifying the kinds of funding that suit the project, and preparing the documents lenders, investors or approving authorities expect.
  • Project review and due diligence: reviewing the operations, management and financial position of an existing business or project so that funders can decide whether to invest or continue.
  • Supporting preparation for discussions with lenders and investors, and planning how the funds will be used.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A feasibility study, or a business plan, suited to the audience it is written for.
  • Financial projections with sensitivity analysis.
  • A funding proposal pack for lenders or investors.
  • A due diligence or project review report, with findings and recommendations.
  • A project implementation plan to guide the use of funds.
Intended benefits

This work aims to give lenders, investors and decision-makers a clear, evidenced picture of what a project involves and whether it stands up. Projections rest on assumptions that we make explicit; they are not forecasts of guaranteed results. We help present the case — we do not guarantee that funding will be secured, and we do not provide regulated investment advice. Where a licensed financial, legal or engineering professional is needed, one should be engaged alongside this work.

Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a business plan and a feasibility study?
A feasibility study tests whether a project should go ahead — technically, economically and commercially. A business plan sets out how it will be delivered and run, and is the document funders usually ask for. Many engagements need both, and they share the same evidence.
Will you guarantee that the project gets funded?
No. Whether funding is provided is a decision for the lender, investor or authority. Our role is to test the case honestly and present it clearly, so that it can be assessed on its merits.
Can you help us find lenders or investors?
We can help identify the kinds of funding that suit a project and prepare the material funders expect. How far that extends is agreed engagement by engagement; we do not act as a licensed broker or guarantee introductions.
Can you review an existing business for an investor or lender?
Yes. Project review and due diligence looks at how an operation is performing and what a funder would need to know before committing further. The scope is agreed at the outset.
Which sectors have you worked in?
The firm’s experience includes broadcasting, cosmetics, food and beverages, banking and finance, manufacturing, hospitality and aviation. The approach is adapted to the sector rather than applied from a single template.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Project Management & Monitoring

For organisations, development programmes and funders that need projects planned, tracked and reported on with sound management practice. The work covers planning, independent monitoring and regular evaluation, so that leadership and funders can see what is happening and what needs attention.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • A project financed by a lender or donor that needs an implementation plan, and a way to track delivery against it.
  • Work spread across several locations, with reporting that differs from one site to the next.
  • Progress reports that arrive late or in different formats, so management can’t see status or risk clearly.
  • Community or stakeholder projects where procedures need to be documented and delivery verified.
  • A project that has drifted from its original plan, and no one is sure by how much.
How we could approach it
  • Assessing the situation: the project, its context, its stakeholders and what has been agreed so far.
  • Preparing a master plan of operations and a project plan of action, with milestones, responsibilities and reporting lines.
  • Preparing a project implementation plan that serves as a management and monitoring tool across locations.
  • Monitoring and verifying progress on a regular cycle, and reporting what is found.
  • Evaluating project performance at regular intervals and recommending corrective action.
  • Documenting the procedures the project relies on, so that delivery does not depend on individuals.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A situation assessment and analysis.
  • A master plan of operations and a project plan of action.
  • A project implementation plan.
  • Regular progress and verification reports, in the format the funder or management requires.
  • A performance evaluation with recommendations.
Intended benefits

This work aims to give management and funders a consistent, evidence-based view of progress, and to surface problems while there is still time to act on them. Independent monitoring reports what it finds; accountability for delivery stays with the project owner. It is not an audit, an engineering inspection or a certification of the work performed.

Frequently asked questions
Do you manage the project, or monitor it?
Either, depending on the engagement. We can support planning and coordination, or provide independent monitoring and evaluation. The role is agreed at the outset so that responsibilities stay clear.
Can you work to a donor’s or lender’s reporting requirements?
Yes. We would agree the reporting format and cycle with you and the funder at the start, and work to that.
Is this a technical or engineering inspection?
No. The work looks at management, planning and delivery against plan. Where technical certification is needed, a suitably qualified professional should be engaged.
How often would we receive progress reports?
The cycle is agreed for each project — for example monthly for an active project — and depends on the pace of the work and what the funder requires.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Training & Capacity Development

For organisations that want their managers and staff to build skills in-house rather than rely on outside advisors. The firm has developed and delivered training programmes across the range of management, from strategy and finance to marketing, customer service and organisational change.

Challenges that might prompt this conversation
  • A management team that has to plan, forecast or analyse performance but has never been trained to.
  • Growth or turnover leaving gaps in finance, marketing or customer-service skills.
  • Concern about fraud or weak controls, and low awareness among staff of how it happens.
  • An organisational change that people don’t fully understand, or are resisting.
  • A workforce approaching retirement, and an employer that wants to prepare people for it.
How we could approach it
  • Agreeing the audience, the skills gap and what participants should be able to do afterwards.
  • Designing a programme around the client’s own context, with practical exercises rather than theory alone.
  • Delivering workshops and courses for managers and staff, in person or in a format that suits the organisation.
  • Providing participant materials that can be reused after the session.
  • Following up on how the learning is being applied, and adjusting the programme if needed.
Illustrative deliverables
  • A short training-needs assessment.
  • A programme outline and participant materials.
  • Delivered workshops or courses.
  • Practical tools participants can reuse, such as templates and checklists.
  • A brief follow-up note on application and next steps.
Intended benefits

This work aims to build practical skills that participants can apply straight away, and to leave the organisation less dependent on outside help. Attending a workshop does not confer a professional qualification or certification, and results depend on how participants apply what they learn.

Frequently asked questions
What topics can you train on?
Programmes to date span strategic planning; business improvement strategies; financial performance analysis and measurement; total quality management; revenue improvement in service organisations; improving customer service; fraud in organisations; marketing of financial services and effective marketing skills; forecasting activity levels; market research for managers; managing employee attitudes and problems; managing organisational change and culture; pre-retirement planning; and business plan development and monitoring.
Can a programme be tailored to our organisation?
Yes. Programmes are shaped around the client’s sector, audience and the decisions participants actually face, rather than delivered from a fixed script.
Is training offered on its own, or only alongside advisory work?
Either. Training can stand alone, or follow an advisory engagement so that a new process, plan or policy is understood by the people who will use it.
Do participants receive a certificate?
Our programmes do not lead to a professional qualification. If you need a record of attendance for your own purposes, we can agree how that is provided.
Discuss your business challenge

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Industries

Where this approach applies.

The advisory approach applies across sectors that matter to the world’s economy. The same way of working — understand, then evidence, then decide — is adapted to the realities of each, rather than applied from a single abstract template.

Financial Services

Banking, mortgage finance, insurance, fintech

Consumer & Retail

FMCG, food and beverages, trade, distribution

Manufacturing & Industrial

Food, cosmetics, building materials, industrial producers

Hospitality & Media

Hotels, broadcasting and media ventures

Energy & Infrastructure

Power, utilities, oil services, resources

Aviation & Transport

Airports, aviation services, transport infrastructure projects

Telecommunications

Operators, digital services

Technology & Innovation

Software, digital platforms, AI-driven systems

Government & Public Sector

Public institutions, agencies, government contracts

Development & NGOs

Donor-funded and development programmes

Agribusiness

Production, supply chains

Healthcare

Health systems, health financing

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Our approach

This is the sequence we follow across engagements, adapted to the scope and timeline of each piece of work.

01

Understand the challenge

We start by clarifying the actual business question, its context and its constraints, and by establishing a baseline assessment of where the organisation stands today.

Client input: the business question, context and constraints.   Output: a shared, written understanding of the problem and the starting position before analysis starts.
02

Assess the evidence

We review what data, documentation and institutional knowledge already exists. Where a question turns on local markets or rules, we work through our local alliances and network.

Client input: access to data, documentation and relevant people.   Output: an honest view of what the evidence actually shows, gaps included.
03

Develop options

We set out a small number of realistic options rather than a single answer presented as obvious.

Output: options with trade-offs made explicit, not hidden behind a recommendation.
04

Agree priorities

Together, we settle on a plan that reflects what the organisation can realistically resource.

Client input: a decision on which option(s) to pursue.   Output: a prioritised, resourced plan.
05

Support implementation or review

Where scope allows, we stay involved through delivery — helping implement the agreed plan, tracking progress through regular reports and evaluating results against the plan. Otherwise we provide a structured handover.

Output: continued involvement with regular progress reports and periodic evaluation, or a clear handover if the engagement ends at the recommendation stage.

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Business insights

Practical notes on strategy, analysis and decision-making

Short, practical pieces connected to our advisory areas.

Preparing for a strategy engagement

What can a leadership team do before a strategy engagement starts, to get more value out of it?

The single most useful thing a leadership team can do before a strategy engagement begins is to write down the specific decision the work needs to inform. “Grow the business” is not a decision; “should we enter market X” is.

It also helps to separate what’s already known from what’s being assumed — teams often discover, once asked directly, that a “fact” behind a strategy has never actually been tested. And it helps to identify, early, who needs to be involved and who will have to live with the outcome, so the work isn’t shaped in a vacuum and then handed to people who weren’t part of shaping it. Finally, being upfront about real constraints — budget, time, internal capability — up front avoids discovering them midway through the engagement, when they’re more expensive to work around.

Takeaways
  • Write down the specific decision the work needs to support, before the work starts.
  • Separate what you know from what you’re assuming.
  • Involve the people who’ll have to implement the outcome from the beginning.

Defining useful business performance indicators

Why do so many KPI dashboards exist without actually changing any decisions?

A common cause is that indicators get chosen because they’re easy to measure, not because they’re tied to a decision anyone actually needs to make. Another is simple volume — tracking a long list of numbers dilutes attention, and a dashboard with forty metrics gets checked far less than one with five that someone is actually accountable for.

A KPI without a named owner tends to drift out of use quietly, and an indicator that made sense a year ago may no longer reflect what matters as the business changes — which is why it’s worth revisiting the set periodically, rather than treating it as fixed once it’s built.

Takeaways
  • Start from the decision the number is meant to inform, not the data that’s easiest to pull.
  • Fewer, well-owned indicators beat a long list nobody checks.
  • Revisit KPIs periodically — what mattered a year ago may not now.

Identifying operational bottlenecks

How can a team find where a process is actually breaking down, rather than guessing?

It starts with mapping the process as it actually happens, not as it’s supposed to happen on paper — the two are often surprisingly different. It also helps to look at where work sits waiting, not just where it’s actively being done; delay usually accumulates in the handoffs between people or teams, not within any single task.

Talking to the people who actually do the work, rather than only their managers, tends to surface a more accurate picture — and when the same complaint turns up at several different points in the process, that repetition is often a better signal of the real bottleneck than any single observation on its own.

Takeaways
  • The biggest delays are usually in the handoffs, not the tasks themselves.
  • Ask the people doing the work — the official process description often differs from practice.
  • A short mapping exercise often surfaces more than months of anecdotal complaints.

Have a decision in front of you?
Let’s talk it through.

Discuss your business challenge

Get in touch

Discuss your business challenge

An initial conversation is most useful when we understand the shape of the challenge before we speak. A short note covering the following helps us prepare:

  • The business challenge or decision you’re facing.
  • What outcome would make the conversation useful to you.
  • Relevant context about the organisation — size, sector, what’s already been tried.
  • Timing — whether this is urgent, or you’re exploring options for later in the year.
Contact details for African Consulting Professionals Ltd are being finalised for this site.

Owner note: please confirm the preferred email address and/or phone number to publish here before this page goes live.
Frequently asked questions
Do you offer a free initial consultation?
We haven’t confirmed a specific policy on this yet — it will be addressed once contact details and engagement terms are finalised.
How quickly will I hear back?
Response times aren’t yet confirmed for this site; we’d rather not promise a timeframe that hasn’t been agreed internally.
Is what I share in an initial conversation confidential?
Confidentiality arrangements would be agreed as part of any engagement; we haven’t published a standing policy here yet.
What happens after the initial conversation?
Typically, the next step is agreeing the scope of a possible engagement — see our approach page for how we propose to work.